LaF esVeIy D DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
fie" BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
eae 701 ©. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR00663-14
14 August 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
er
CRE 2 in BR
Ref: fai Yatle 10 7.8.0. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) memo
7220 Ser N130D/14U1015 of 4 Aug 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to
retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay from 12 June 2007 to 12
June 2008 at a rate of $150.00 per month.
>. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11
August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
Docket No.NROOG63-14
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner is entitled to receive retroactive Special
Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP), level 2 ($150.00) per month from 21
June 2007 to 8 July 2008.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
5s Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
14 August 2014 Ripe,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
ee rs - a bn ee ea cial aly apeeceemamaaae
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0461 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is authorized to be paid dive pay for having designator 113X (SEAL Officer), at the rate of $240.00 per month vice $150.00 per month from 13 January 2003 through 24 August 2012. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2754 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay from 8 April 2013 to 3 July 2013 due to his assignment as a Helicopter Rescue Swimmer (NEC 7815). Docket No.NRO2754-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3695 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that “the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Docket Ne: NPRO3695-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7093 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN | Docket No.NRO7093-14 9 December 2014 From: .Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1;0f/i ey Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5399 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay from 23 March 2011 to 28 February 2012, at a rate of $150.00 per month. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03409-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6917 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to Special Duty Assignment Pay from 11 April 2011 to 25 March 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8335-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed_Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...